From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 13:42:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AA7106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@legolasweb.nl) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971268FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Msb-0002re-5E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:09 +0100 Received: from 5357e32a.cm-6-8d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.227.42] helo=homey.local) by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Msa-00020D-Sx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:09 +0100 Received: from homey.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homey.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SDEPgX009644 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stas@homey.local) Received: (from stas@localhost) by homey.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SDEPDI009643 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stas) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 From: Stas Verberkt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: -0.8 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_05=-0.5, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=2.496, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.2 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:48 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even br= anches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here ru= ns 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. >=20 Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven branch? Kind regards, Stas Verberkt --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQJFBAEBCAAvBQJPTNMxKBpodHRwOi8vc3Rhcy52ZXJiZXJrdC5uZXQvcGdwL3Bv bGljeS50eHQACgkQaH4c59IqtYhaGg//W7ngg2pcB1nEAAcr3McXyTMkL0bbTFuR 4hKd/tLY9GB2UyNYAV5XGYCLvsvtjrPiGYJv/LKyBMgMe+TbMPLFbCJivh3j3uPe Q3onfKMHip/U/SwZnMfrskJ9TjE2SdMbM2k9I28EQNNOhatCEUbsAJYPAU142nKU xkv7awA92STigREntZm66oY82f4qmxzpU3MNk7t0yNRpJgln3hS3OdHwzWXHskvd iM3UZjoxGYwNFHctOitI8VmVMqI6fCFQeOSLkLuVXfGDyB48ZXeDokvYULlQdsii nqRZ0N9FNqD8CHpOl8bGRgxZESsktr3zJVywTFF9XsImLGsJ1Ebu0HTObhqva9e2 GJKBQ4wUtW4INtUXQCu84pgHDpi4dI8S4a89FOFCm27rdg5Z06HAQMPWbXPwDdBD DsTjvBrSxpzzpqcAUxzg4GbguWXBKZcZFaTlvN16A3xt73aAc69Lvhr0yLJPq7dQ eGWloWQGycqNaw5XE3jcKnHBQW1X9bGsA/nvz7d8UBeJB8GTG8iwz1j3jA5sih+C bs0lukKevL9lXWUTsc0Y+uJ4m3r1aUBjAU0klWag3oMU7ZdHS1cAkGxcsWuRY6it LawabYuysoJqdy/g/6Fk1lLiPP1JwvSgZQKl0iL1ZpI2k+UkD9u00hy8cqls3tNh NQvSdbMUO7k= =ggIZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--