From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  2 11:05:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CFC4816A4CE; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:05:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E686843D1D; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 11:05:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i12J3gs7002696;
	Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:03:46 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Feb 2004 11:03:07 PST."
             <20040202110216.H23006@root.org> 
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:03:42 +0100
Message-ID: <2695.1075748622@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_thermal.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 19:05:55 -0000

In message <20040202110216.H23006@root.org>, Nate Lawson writes:
>On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:
>> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
>> > Could we change it to be:
>> >
>> > 	after N seconds:	go to single user.
>> > 	after N + M seconds:	shutdown.
>>
>> Spinning down disks and setting the CPU clock to the lowest setting
>> available are other measures we might consider.
>
>This is already underway with the cpufreq effort.  Once it is working,
>we'll use it for passive cooling, which is a last resort before _CRT.

Uhm, not all machines support cpufreq...

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.