From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 05:13:21 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC13916A468 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from pecan.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9394613C43E for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:13:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from 28.201.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.201.28] helo=[192.168.100.148]) by pecan.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hzn4h-0003V5-2O; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:13:19 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> References: <4673B0DB.3040100@sasktel.net> <46742CF6.3050901@sasktel.net> <20070616202819.GA29331@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8623CF89-858D-4524-9B4A-9147913739F3@brooknet.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:13:03 +1000 To: Stephen Hurd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: ports Subject: Re: Clarification on fetch/extract targets X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:13:21 -0000 On 17/06/2007, at 7:33 AM, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> Actually, I found it quite easy to have the port pull the sources >>> from svn. Who are we concerned about making it easier for and >>> why (and how is it any easier?) >>> >> >> Everyone behind a firewall that only allows fetching via HTTP/FTP, >> for >> one. Also everyone without live network access, and those with >> pay-per-download who have a free local distfile mirror, etc. >> >> Tarballs are overwhelmingly preferred. >> >> Kris >> > Ok... I was looking at it from the standpoint of someone who wants > the newest version and doesn't care of the pkg-plist is stale. > They could just bump PORTREVISION and reinstall. > > So... how about this: > - A distfile target which generates a distfile. The idea being > that this would be the one on the local distfile mirror or what > have you. > - A WITH_SVN option (defaults to off) which allows the end user to > specify he/she wants to use the subversion. > > In this case then, the end user would need to bump PORTREVISION and > enable the WITH_SVN option. Rather than suggesting that users change PORTREVISION, just suggest that they set WITH_SVN and force an upgrade (eg. portupgrade -f yourport).