From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May 21 13:36:55 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA27465
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 21 May 1996 13:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA27459
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 May 1996 13:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA09903; Tue, 21 May 1996 14:36:40 -0600
Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 14:36:40 -0600
From: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>
Message-Id: <199605212036.OAA09903@rocky.sri.MT.net>
To: "Eric J. Chet" <ejc@gargoyle.bazzle.com>
Cc: John Capo <jc@irbs.com>, Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net>,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DNS question
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.93.960521162952.16158D-100000@gargoyle>
References: <199605210614.CAA22689@irbs.irbs.com>
	<Pine.BSI.3.93.960521162952.16158D-100000@gargoyle>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > The libc resolver is broken for non-terminal in-addr lookups.

[ Patch deleted ]

> 	Will this patch be commited to -current?

I'm away from my box all this week, but I'll test it and apply it to
both -stable and -current next week if someone doesn't beat me to it or
jump up with any valed reason to *not* do it.


Nate