From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 25 17:39:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A291516A528 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:39:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from keylime.silverwraith.com (keylime.silverwraith.com [69.55.228.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B62343D45 for ; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) Received: from keylime.silverwraith.com ([69.55.228.10]) by keylime.silverwraith.com with esmtp (Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD)) id 1CtUeU-0001GY-IV; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:38:54 -0800 Received: (from avleen@localhost)j0PHcqjR004410; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:38:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com) X-Authentication-Warning: keylime.silverwraith.com: avleen set sender to lists-freebsd@silverwraith.com using -f Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:38:52 -0800 From: Avleen Vig To: Kang Liu Message-ID: <20050125173852.GU19973@silverwraith.com> References: <306655831.12043@bjut.edu.cn> <306658548.02074@bjut.edu.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <306658548.02074@bjut.edu.cn> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: delphij@delphij.net Subject: Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:39:06 -0000 On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:24:57PM +0800, Kang Liu wrote: > Delphij, > I think the base should be as *clean* as possible, it might be > better if we put nc into ports. :P I agree. base should be minimal, everythign optional (eg 'perl' :P) should be in ports. There people can choose the versions (eg 5.6 or 5.8), where to install them, etc etc.