From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Dec 19 14:24:46 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 19 14:24:41 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from spammie.svbug.com (unknown [198.79.110.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A7F37B69B; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from spammie.svbug.com (localhost.mozie.org [127.0.0.1]) by spammie.svbug.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA16125; Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jessem@spammie.svbug.com) Message-Id: <200012192226.OAA16125@spammie.svbug.com> Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 14:26:24 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com Reply-To: opentrax@email.com Subject: Re: chflags bug? To: bright@wintelcom.net Cc: dima@unixfreak.org, nuno.teixeira@pt-quorum.com, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001218143341.G19572@fw.wintelcom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: jessem@spammie.svbug.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 18 Dec, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * opentrax@email.com [001218 13:29] wrote: >> I'm sure this topic has been discussed to death in core, arch >> and stable. But this 'kernel_securelevel' has got to be >> amoung the screwyist ideas to date. >> >> Note: Flames to me will hit /dev/null >> >> I'm just expressing my opinion. > > So you think that once someone aquires root, they should be able to > wipe all logs of thier intrusion? > No. I expect anyone capable of breaking in my system to create an account for themselves. Let me know they have an account. And close the hole. Other behaviour would be rude and unwelcome. Please don't send more flame bait, either. Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message