From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 22 13:02:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41E516A4CE for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:02:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes04.telusplanet.net (outbound02.telus.net [199.185.220.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C23A43D45 for ; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 13:02:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@icionline.ca) Received: from [192.168.19.4] (really [142.179.173.206]) by priv-edtnes04.telusplanet.netESMTP <20031222210200.IPQP5353.priv-edtnes04.telusplanet.net@[192.168.19.4]>; Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:02:00 -0700 From: James Earl To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20031222.112145.100424196.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031222092127.GA2355@cactus.homeunix.org> <1072116630.576.4.camel@chero> <20031222.112145.100424196.imp@bsdimp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1072126978.76846.6.camel@work.ici> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 14:02:58 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Continued problems with Aironet device and 5.2-RC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 21:02:02 -0000 On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 11:21, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <1072116630.576.4.camel@chero> > James Earl writes: > : On Mon, 2003-12-22 at 02:30, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > In message: <20031222092127.GA2355@cactus.homeunix.org> > : > jqdkf@army.com writes: > : > : On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 01:20:14AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > : > In message: <20031222053002.GA872@cactus.homeunix.org> > : > : > jqdkf@army.com writes: > : > : > : cbb0: Unsupported card type detected > : > : > > : > : > This is typically a symptom of the resource allocation bugs I've been > : > : > fighting... > : > : > > : > : > : > : So are you suggesting that I should adjust the resource by myself, like > : > : irq numbers, for now? > : > > : > I have the unhelpful advice "make sure two devices aren't using the > : > same address." You'll likely have to decode all the BARs to make sure > : > that this is the case. > : > : So, would this be the reason why I haven't been able to get my an0 > : device to appear on it's own in the vmstat -i output? It seems the > : uhci2 device follows the an0 device to whatever irq I assign to it (an0) > : in the bios setup. > > an0 will share interrupts with the CardBus bridge and whatever it > shares with. Do you know if my fxp0 device would also share interrupts with the cardbus bridge also? Would you say my Aironet problems sound related to the resource allocation bugs that you're fighting? James