From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:41:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC19E1065670 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be [143.129.75.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C238FC18 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Pieter.Donche@ua.ac.be) Received: from hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n0DAfRCX015637 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (pdon@localhost) by hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id n0DAfRro015634 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:27 +0100 (CET) X-Authentication-Warning: hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be: pdon owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:41:26 +0100 (CET) From: Pieter Donche X-X-Sender: pdon@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be To: "mail.list freebsd-questions" Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: mountd, DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Pieter Donche List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:41:30 -0000 Installed FreeBSD-amd64 and asked to set up NFS server and client during sysinstall. In the boot process, at 'mountd' it takes some time, then: Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: can't get address info for host hmacs.cmi.ua .ac.be Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: bad host hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be, skipping Jan 12 14:36:10 macos mountd[686]: bad exports lists line /home hmacs.cmi.ua.a c.be When adding a line 143.129.75.10 hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be in /etc/hosts (via vi) this messages disappears. I can use NFS. But why is this needed? I can use DNS names for any other host (ssh-ing to them works..) so why not for this at boot time ? of is this normal?