From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Nov 27 8:27:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vicosa.dpi.ufv.br (vicosa.dpi.ufv.br [200.17.74.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48CA737B416 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 08:27:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from larc1 (larc1.dpi.ufv.br [200.17.77.27]) by vicosa.dpi.ufv.br (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id fARGSxb07616; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 13:28:59 -0300 Message-ID: <001501c17760$940c89e0$1b4d11c8@dpi.ufv.br> From: "Luiz Gustavo da Silva Neves" To: "Mandy Moore" , References: Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 14:28:42 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've tried it but it not seems to work (the msg still appear), but I think that when I put the second subnet up it will work as I want (I hope). The biggest problem is that the realtek interface just don't let me connect to anywhere. Could it be the rl0 module? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mandy Moore" To: "Mike Smith" Cc: "Luiz Gustavo da Silva Neves" ; Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:46 PM Subject: Re: Realtek 8139 > I've been using 2 3com nics on a same subnet for almost a year and both > nics work fine as well as the clients ip forwading etc etc but I had > to bear with that "xxxx is on xl0 but got reply from xl1" until a good > samaritan told me how to get rid of such msg from syslog :) > this what I put in my /etc/sysctl.conf : > > net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface=0 > > > > On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Mike Smith wrote: > > > > > Please don't sent HTML messages to the list. > > > > This question should have gone to the -questions list. > > > > > I'm having trouble configuring my two ethernets machine. The first > > > interface seems ok, but the second one doesn't let me connect to the > > > internet. The most strange think is that I can ping other machines, but > > > my connections just are not completed. To test it I just put one > > > interface up and the other down. When I but both up in the same subnet > > > (just to test), a msg appears in the shell ("xxxx is on fxp0 but got > > > reply from rl0" when the rl0 is configured in /etc/hosts and "xxxx is on > > > rl0 but got reply from fxp0" when the fxp0 is configured). Is it > > > normal,I mean, it happens because both interfaces are in the same > > > subnet? > > > > You can't do this; you can only have one interface on a given subnet. > > > > As for the initial problem; please repost your question on the -questions > > list, and provide more details. There's nowhere near enough information > > here for anyone to help you. > > > > -- > > ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his > > rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want > > to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force > > people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] > > V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message