From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 16 18:50:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C62937B401; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B847E43F93; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 18:50:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h7H1oUT6047412; Sat, 16 Aug 2003 20:50:30 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 20:50:30 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20030817015029.GA2653@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030815111856.GN395@garage.freebsd.pl> <20030817011545.GW395@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030817011545.GW395@garage.freebsd.pl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Robert Watson cc: Buckie Subject: Re: GEOM Gate. X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 01:50:35 -0000 In the last episode (Aug 17), Pawel Jakub Dawidek said: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 11:53:11AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote: > +> That said, I think the geom gate stuff looks very cool :-). You > +> might be able to run some interesting performance numbers > +> comparing NFS and UFS over a remote block device. > > Ok. After last geom gate optimizations I'm ready to show some tests. > > NFS read: 2539890 bytes/sec > NFS write: 2668428 bytes/sec > > GG read file: 5791796 bytes/sec (file was exported) > GG write file: 4071411 bytes/sec (file was exported) > > GG read device: 4635277 bytes/sec (disk device was exported) > GG write device: I wasn't able to test What kind of hardware were you using? 2.5MB/sec NFS sounds abysmal. You should be able to saturate a 100mbit link with anything made in the last 5 years. The slowest machine I have it a P6/200 with FreeBSD 4.1 and this disk: ad0: 3067MB [6232/16/63] at ata0-master using WDMA2 , which does 7MB/sec raw, can feed a NFS client doing a file read at 5MB/sec. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com