From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb  2 12:42:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B339216A4CF
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F17D243D66
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Mon,  2 Feb 2004 12:42:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: (qmail 23587 invoked by uid 1000); 2 Feb 2004 20:42:38 -0000
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:42:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402021239280.74265-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
Message-ID: <20040202124222.X23520@root.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0402021239280.74265-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
cc: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/acpica acpi_thermal.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:42:41 -0000

On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
>
> > "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> writes:
> > > Could we change it to be:
> > >
> > > =09after N seconds:=09go to single user.
> > > =09after N + M seconds:=09shutdown.
> >
> > Spinning down disks and setting the CPU clock to the lowest setting
> > available are other measures we might consider.
>
> or setting a mode where we intersperse active 'ticks'
> with ticks where we just do HLT.

No.

-Nate