From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jan 26 22:31:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CBD37B401 for ; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:30:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac1.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.141]) by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA22044; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from rac1.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA03397; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:30:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac1.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA03393; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:30:50 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rac1.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:30:50 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: Greg Lehey Cc: Assad Khan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-VS-Linux---Some Venting from Linux's side! In-Reply-To: <20010127121012.F12091@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > No, that's not correct. The VM system has borrowed a lot from > FreeBSD, but the networking code is still very different, though it's > true that they're borrowing individual features. well, I just remembered reading that their networking code borrowed a lot from FreeBSD. Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message