From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 8 13:25:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA02414 for current-outgoing; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:25:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from hwcn.org (ac199@james.hwcn.org [199.212.94.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA02309; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 13:24:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hoek@hwcn.org) Received: from localhost (ac199@localhost) by hwcn.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA24680; Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:20:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 1998 16:20:54 -0500 (EST) From: Tim Vanderhoek To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: Satoshi Asami , ache@nagual.pp.ru, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tk80 port or tcl installation are broken on -current In-Reply-To: <14994.884221928@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > Yes, I see the problem. No, I see no immediate solution that doesn't > have drawbacks of its own. Yes, I hate this entire problem and would > just as soon say "heck, just nuke TCL out of the base OS" if I had Pity there isn't an "upgrade system TCL to ports TCL" port... Hmm... :) -- Outnumbered? Maybe. Outspoken? Never! tIM...HOEk