From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 22 21:01:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5861065742; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:01:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028E614D9CB; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:01:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E025828.1020702@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:01:28 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh References: <4E00F5A9.6040900@FreeBSD.org> <20110621200214.GB62312@DataIX.net> <4E00FDD7.3060204@FreeBSD.org> <20110622202809.GA92250@bonjour.sunpoet.net> In-Reply-To: <20110622202809.GA92250@bonjour.sunpoet.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jhell , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: shells/ksh93 install fail X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 21:01:33 -0000 On 6/22/2011 1:28 PM, Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:23:51PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 6/21/2011 1:02 PM, jhell wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:48:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>>> An effort to upgrade to 20110208_1 is failing for me: >>>> >>>> ===> Installing for ksh93-20110208_1 >>>> ===> Generating temporary packing list >>>> ===> Checking if shells/ksh93 already installed >>>> install -o root -g wheel -m 555 >>>> /usr/local/tmp/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh /usr/local/bin/ksh93 >>>> install: $WRKDIRPREFIX/usr/ports/shells/ksh93/work/bin/ksh: No such file >>>> or directory >>>> *** Error code 71 >>>> >>>> Is it possible that $WRKDIRPREFIX is the trigger? >>>> >>> >>> I did not actually see that here on 8-STABLE/i386, just for the record. >> >> Thanks. At least one person on IRC said that it worked for them with >> or without $WRKDIRPREFIX, so that's probably not it. What's odd is >> that these package building systems have been working fine for >> hundreds of ports for quite a while now, so I'm stumped. > > Hi Doug, > > I have WRKDIRPREFIX=/usr/ports/works in /etc/make.conf. I'm running a > 8-STABLE amd64. Do you need me to generate a build log for you to > further investigate this problem? > > BTW, did you run 'find' to search for ksh? The binary must be somewhere > in the WRKSRC. It might be helpful to know the path of ksh. It didn't exist at all. However I think I found the problem. If I remove the STATIC option everything goes as planned. Perhaps that gives you a new area to examine? Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/