From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 18 12:22:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5517E16A41F; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from mail.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F3543D45; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:22:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03CB217B853; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from patsy.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (patsy.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 90911-01; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from radagast.ijs.si (radagast.ijs.si [193.2.4.168]) by patsy.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A33017B867; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.ijs.si (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by radagast.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22451702C; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Ceri Davies Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 14:22:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 In-Reply-To: <20050818101822.GK55885@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508181422.08187.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Cc: Andrey Slusar , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Nobutaka MANTANI Subject: Re: xemacs vs emacs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:22:16 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > > I don't care if these ports conflict. Is there a way to install them > both despite the presence of CONFLICTS? I don't think you can without removing CONFLICTS from Makefile before installing, but I'd also like to have them both installed on some places... > Ceri > > PS If the xemacs port were to install ctags, etags, etc. as xctags then > the conflict could maybe be avoided. I haven't checked the full list > but those are glaring. FWIW, NetBSD pkgsrc seems to prefix conflicting files with emacs- and xemacs-. Here are the cvsweb links to their plist files: http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/editors/xemacs/PLIST?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/editors/emacs/PLIST?rev=1.11&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup I've CCed the maintainers of emacs, xemacs21-mule and xemacs-mule-devel to see what they think; other versions seem unmaintained as far as I've checked. Dejan