From owner-freebsd-current Tue Nov 23 19: 6:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [169.237.7.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0721542E for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:06:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (root@d60-025.leach.ucdavis.edu [169.237.60.25]) by relay.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA55844 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:06:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA50989 for current@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:06:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 19:06:14 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD security auditing project. Message-ID: <19991123190614.E49362@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19991123142626.D49964@dragon.nuxi.com> <3778.943405379@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3778.943405379@localhost>; from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com on Tue, Nov 23, 1999 at 05:02:59PM -0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I don't see any reason, for example, why anyone should still be using > gets() and our implementation even gets whiney about it if you do. That one is definitely up for a global search and replace as its only use is to read external data. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message