From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 18 12:42:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA29948 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 12:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (root@mexico.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.253]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA29928 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 12:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (brasil.brainstorm.fr [193.56.58.33]) by mexico.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA20622 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:42:02 +0100 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by brasil.brainstorm.eu.org (8.8.4/8.6.12) with UUCP id VAA06441 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 21:41:48 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.8.5/keltia-uucp-2.9) id UAA09398; Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:20:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <19970218202010.DV57051@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:20:10 +0100 From: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert) To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CTC Linux Mandate References: <19970217225113.MC38075@keltia.freenix.fr> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.60,1-3,9 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#2999 In-Reply-To: ; from Tom Samplonius on Feb 17, 1997 16:00:27 -0800 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk According to Tom Samplonius: > Huh? Doesn't 2.2 and higher use phkmalloc which according to reports is > *better* than gnumalloc? Plus, isn't gnumalloc being depreciated out of > FreeBSD? 2.2 yes. I think the original poster was talking about 2.1.*... There are a lot a people still in 2.1.* so my comment still apply. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #39: Sun Feb 2 22:12:44 CET 1997