From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 19 04:22:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4546416A468 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from pecan.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2F713C44B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from boris@brooknet.com.au) Received: from 28.201.233.220.exetel.com.au ([220.233.201.28] helo=[192.168.100.148]) by pecan.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1I0VEY-0001Z4-0P; Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:22:26 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4677563C.7090909@sasktel.net> References: <4673B0DB.3040100@sasktel.net> <46742CF6.3050901@sasktel.net> <20070616202819.GA29331@rot13.obsecurity.org> <4674572D.9060707@sasktel.net> <8623CF89-858D-4524-9B4A-9147913739F3@brooknet.com.au> <46765049.3080605@sasktel.net> <4B85C7D6-E5C1-450C-B2B2-8D130C1B909F@brooknet.com.au> <4677563C.7090909@sasktel.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <076C3370-474B-4161-8341-0C66AED2ACDB@brooknet.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Sam Lawrance Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:22:10 +1000 To: Stephen Hurd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) Cc: ports Subject: Re: Clarification on fetch/extract targets X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 04:22:29 -0000 On 19/06/2007, at 2:06 PM, Stephen Hurd wrote: > Sam Lawrance wrote: >> Maybe I don't understand what you're trying to do. What's the >> point of bumping PORTREVISION? >> >> For that matter, what's the point of WITH_SVN given what you've >> just said? > > PORTREVISION == SVN Revision OK, it makes sense to me now that you explained that.