From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 27 13:27:52 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 43BF71065677; Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:27:52 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:27:52 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Bernhard Fr?hlich <decke@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20120827132752.GA59345@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201208271253.q7RCrfNp099110@svn.freebsd.org>
	<20120827130920.GA55054@FreeBSD.org>
	<CAE-m3X2Fb4cgQHm5q0fm3A2N3E1gtbdXFYcEKUNMk=DvtA4g1g@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAE-m3X2Fb4cgQHm5q0fm3A2N3E1gtbdXFYcEKUNMk=DvtA4g1g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
	ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r303225 - in head/emulators: virtualbox-ose
	virtualbox-ose-additions virtualbox-ose-kmod virtualbox-ose/files
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
	<svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>, 
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
	<mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 13:27:52 -0000

On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:24:00PM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hlich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:53:41PM +0000, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> >> +LICENSE=     GPLv2
> >> +LICENSE_FILE=        ${WRKSRC}/COPYING
> >
> > Why specify LICENSE_FILE for standard licenses?  License framework was
> > supposed to reduce filesystem spamming with identical copies of GPL, not to
> > contribute to it further.
> 
> Ever looked at that file before complaining? It is GPLv2 but with a few notes
> that make it worth keeping:

I was not complaining, I was asking.  Given all the exceptions below, I in
turn wonder if it's OK to set LICENSE to GPLv2.

./danfe