From owner-freebsd-current Wed Feb 16 15:52:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from builder.freebsd.org (builder.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5288C37B583 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:52:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jasone@canonware.com) Received: from canonware.com (canonware.com [207.20.242.18]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32ADB132DD for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 22072 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Feb 2000 23:52:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:52:22 -0800 From: Jason Evans To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Jason Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Heads up, vm.max_proc_mmap sysctl added Message-ID: <20000216155222.G18774@sturm.canonware.com> References: <200002162118.NAA54097@apollo.backplane.com> <20000216141339.C18774@sturm.canonware.com> <20000216141622.E18774@sturm.canonware.com> <200002162333.PAA54729@apollo.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200002162333.PAA54729@apollo.backplane.com>; from dillon@apollo.backplane.com on Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Feb 16, 2000 at 03:33:58PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > Is anyone interested in me doing this for the 4.0 release? It would > help both our current threads model and the linux threads model a lot. > I can do it in a day and it should be trivial to test, the modifications > are actually quite minor. I would really like to see this change happen, and will happily make the necessary libc_r and linuxthreads changes to use the functionality, but we're well into the code freeze right now, which IMO makes this more appropriate for 4.1. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message