From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 12 15:56:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6377A25 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4579D1D78 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6CFujoS085166 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:56:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <51E02729.7070203@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:56:25 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jls usage References: <51DF59B1.4020107@a1poweruser.com> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FBF9CF@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51DFCDD2.2010104@fjl.co.uk> <13CA24D6AB415D428143D44749F57D7201FC19A4@ltcfiswmsgmb21> <51E01A22.7030306@fjl.co.uk> <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <51E021AA.5030905@fjl.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:56:48 -0000 On 12/07/2013 16:32, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I've tried using the actual jail name, and the hostname to be sure - > nothing - and on checking (jls -v) I'm somehow ending up with the Name > being the same as the ID. I just put this down to a quirk/bug (it's > there in 8.2-9) but it sounds like it's not an issue for anyone else. > I'm defining them in rc.conf: >>>> >>>> jail_enable="yes" >>>> jail_list="one two three" >>>> >>>> jail_agnet_rootdir="/usr/jail/one" >>>> jail_agnet_hostname="one.mydomain.com" >>>> jail_agnet_ip="123.123.123.123" >>>> jail_agnet_devfs_enable="yes" >>>> jail_agnet_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" >>>> >>> You've configured "one" and "two" and "three" in your jail_list, but >>> quite oddly... >>> >>> You have not defined "jail_one_*" or "jail_two_*" or "jail_three_*". >>> >>> I'm extremely confused as to how your jail even started! >> >> Sorry - should have said I'd obfuscated the IP addresses and >> hostnames (it's not really "one.mydomain.com" ;-) ) Unfortunately I >> forgot to obfuscate the jail name as fully as I thought in the >> startup lines. It should have read jail_one_rootdir &c. >> >> As I said, it's been working happily for years on lots of different >> installations and they're all configured the same. The only weirdness >> is that the jail name appears in the table as it's number. > > A further clarification - I know using the jail utility defaults the > jail name to that of its ID if you don't specify one, and presume this > is the mechanism messing it up here. However as I've gone to the > trouble of configuring them in rc.conf with names, listing said names > in jail_list and when commands like: > > service jail start one > service jail stop one > > work just fine, I don't see what I'm doing wrong! Incidentally, it > doesn't matter if I start them at boot time or start/stop later - the > jail name always sets to the jail-iD, and not the name specified. I > suspect a bug in the rc.d script, but I can't be the first person to > notice, can I??? I'll take a look. > Okay - answering my own question and solved... It's a bug (or is that a feature?). In /etc/rc.d/jail line 647 it currently reads: eval ${_setfib} jail ${_flags} -i ${_rootdir} ${_hostname} \ \"${_addrl}\" ${_exec_start} > ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \ ${_tmp_jail} 2>&1 \