From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 30 10:33:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from hunkular.glarp.com (hunkular.glarp.com [199.117.25.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6614037B405 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 10:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from hunkular.glarp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hunkular.glarp.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f9UIXMZ41710; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:33:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from huntting@hunkular.glarp.com) Message-Id: <200110301833.f9UIXMZ41710@hunkular.glarp.com> To: Julian Elischer Cc: Peter Wemm , Bruce Evans , Garance A Drosihn , Nate Williams , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:49:27 PST." Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 11:33:22 -0700 From: Brad Huntting Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I see not reason that the timestamps should be signed.. Arithmatic on timestamps will break if time_t is changed to unsigned. brad To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message