From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May  3 13:20:49 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C9416A422
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 May 2006 13:20:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com)
Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.198])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D77043D58
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed,  3 May 2006 13:20:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com)
Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id t13so108320wxc
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 03 May 2006 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
	b=VakhQFCc3Rfes/jOGSXKrvFaGGv4JTKgB8SqcbHuV8Blojcy4D3BN64tbAo6oRQbRGMb08C9u2GbIzkweMlghtJoZ9jSwuBQ0ipXWhzlIT8N+V8t7ZqKPdsJQQDlb7xudKv0xh68U9QpzT6g2m0KqWpl04VGLiO+jiOrWN8MPok=
Received: by 10.70.98.6 with SMTP id v6mr37042wxb;
	Wed, 03 May 2006 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.70.27.10 with HTTP; Wed, 3 May 2006 06:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <790a9fff0605030620h55c49545pc995f571e52c7269@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:20:40 -0500
From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To: "Sean Bryant" <bryants@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f6791cc60605021413q852c528x257393ebf5c39d1f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20060502171813.GA7296@roadrunner.q.local>
	<790a9fff0605021216s6db35c26m465148b051af74d3@mail.gmail.com>
	<f6791cc60605021413q852c528x257393ebf5c39d1f@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipw2100 vs ndis(4) -- does it work for anybody?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 13:20:49 -0000

On 5/2/06, Sean Bryant <bryants@gmail.com> wrote:
> ndisgen is broken on 6.1 RC1 if I remember correctly.

ndisgen wasn't broken, wpa_supplicant was broken as it didn't
recognize the ndis interfaces.  The fix has since been applied to
-CURRENT and MFC'd to the RELENG_6 and RELENG_6_1 branches.

Scot


--
DISCLAIMER:
No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.