From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 30 15:39:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B911065691 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 15:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E068FC18 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 15:39:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4UFdCuw018536; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:39:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n4UFdCZl018533; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:39:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:39:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: J.McKeown@ru.ac.za In-Reply-To: <20090529232416.30761kw9zzhlqav4@mail.ru.ac.za> Message-ID: References: <23711563.post@talk.nabble.com> <200905290934.36220.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20090529064800.7c0c10d3@scorpio> <200905291550.45971.j.mckeown@ru.ac.za> <20090529111326.17638be5@scorpio> <20090529232416.30761kw9zzhlqav4@mail.ru.ac.za> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Competition law (was Re: Canon printer and TurboPrint) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:39:21 -0000 > I know what socialism means. You seem not to. I haven't anywhere advocated > state ownership of businesses - in fact I very clearly stated that I believe > in a free market with only that level of regulation required to keep it free > from monopoly abuse. You are wrong. there is no monopoly abuse when monopoly doesn't have extra support from government. How could monopoly (if monopoly happen at all) abuse ? Selling below costs? OK let they sell, others will wait a bit or even buy the products until monopoly will not have money to continue this, then compete with the monopoly by selling back what they bought on below-cost prices. Forcing others to stop producing? how?