From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 6 09:40:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C4FCE8 for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ralf.mardorf@rocketmail.com) Received: from nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com (nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com [212.82.109.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D578FC1A for ; Thu, 6 Dec 2012 09:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.82.105.245] by nm25.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Dec 2012 09:40:34 -0000 Received: from [217.146.189.106] by tm17.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Dec 2012 09:40:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp122.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Dec 2012 09:40:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rocketmail.com; s=s1024; t=1354786834; bh=8KyAH1pL68AX5FC5bbzmjpabsCVRpCQ1drOMIqlhy9w=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sYIDWeT14jhF664sOccJcrkLMxx/fBDTavE953kxql8uUYV58H9hbgZ0Ydk41LdcMW6W0wpDv+JjWnGy7tGTyAL/YU+ugXsEYse78Mn+dqAfaCs6kB4nkxG/rBdrb95cIXdTgh9dNICszQHo9Tf+I9XBND8rpe6u3xdwzmysgvI= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 664545.87949.bm@smtp122.mail.ird.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: JqDSr1wVM1maRk_qNkfjEXfiewWv9IJYQl38._iP51eWMza wl99Ep4.HFzXt43rN6zG0lyQ5pplSyor9XMbFJT7z9VtGBDdouKYoI06ukHa dATb7INLFzze65MyICcvUblb3u_tOnTDjJw5e.pOEVk9gPTwpsMXlHyO6nM0 Ld8iXJk6jav7XzcFDMBQLkdiMiABEMs6iOHccYRNH6PQh3wjb3l5HKY.tWa3 ahOu9QNQNmmFnfI_aMP0JRNexgRjgQPdT14XWbLoj0SFwIv9nNib77LW7pKi YxpX6N7nQU58VrMmJ_mbrLHs2EtbUf7KM0AxV13ZZkraTRyV0pArdaU8uwMc YwixW56CfvL2CcrDB3p5dpz6jQAgs88nOBz_SN8GwKVn3tRLyTNm_JDp7IKz p49LcnMSmxL0.4FuiDUVHAmZ2mmSYhltu1xOLd1c- X-Yahoo-SMTP: BeMCPs2swBABTJ3kAeEiC_hE0mz8jRexLddJfD8pI2j32fOacjBmXg-- Received: from [85.182.19.224] (ralf.mardorf@85.182.19.224 with login) by smtp122.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Dec 2012 01:40:34 -0800 PST Message-ID: <1354786833.6430.8.camel@q> Subject: Re: Why 24/192kHz sound is not a solution. From: Ralf Mardorf To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 10:40:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <1354723094926-5766828.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.6.0-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2012 09:40:42 -0000 On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 09:47 -0800, VDR User wrote: > I don't know that using the mailing list to post links to articles is > appropriate, but 24/192 does matter when it comes to processing. As > only a final output format, that article is completely correct but to > completely disregard 24/192 is misleading because it does have benefit > earlier in the production chain. I didn't read the article, I only read the mails. You don't need more than 48KHz/32-bit float. 48 KHz is high enough to protect against the Nyquist issue and for production there are advantages, when using a high bit rate and floating point. What benefit should there be, when using 192KHz? Regards, Ralf