From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Sat Dec 12 17:54:12 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB82EA1416B
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1961AB4
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBCHsCED000805
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:54:12 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205263] Fix for netwait boot order issues and other bugs
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:54:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: conf
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: easy, needs-qa, patch, patch-ready
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: ian@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10+
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status flagtypes.name bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-205263-8-J9oIU2juTa@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205263-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205263-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 17:54:13 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205263

Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |In Progress
              Flags|mfc-stable10?               |mfc-stable10+
           Severity|Affects Only Me             |Affects Some People

--- Comment #5 from Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> ---
I agree that this change is shaping up nicely to help folks who use usb-based
network interfaces that rely on devd to start up.

I think any potential controversy over making the ip list optional might
evaporate if the logic were changed to look at both the ip and the interface
list and if they're both empty say something like "Warning: No interfaces or IP
addresses listed, nothing to wait for".  If either list is non-empty, just
quietly do whatever work was requested.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.