From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Apr 24 21:33: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4404337B513 for ; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:33:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from argon.blackdawn.com ([209.69.77.148]) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA99315; Mon, 24 Apr 2000 21:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by argon.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5F05193F; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400 From: Will Andrews To: Chuck Robey Cc: Will Andrews , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: syslog-ng's category (see PR 18187) Message-ID: <20000425003243.C445@argon.blackdawn.com> References: <20000425001747.B445@argon.blackdawn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from chuckr@picnic.mat.net on Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: > Noting that both are reasonable answers, I would say that since it's only > a user of security, and doesn't either provide security to other services > or audits (only use security in providing it's own service) I would stick > it into sysutils. I would, too. But I'm going to gather opinions before I make a decision. So far the favor seems to be sysutils. Thanks for your opinion. -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message