From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 13:21:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A04B16A4B3; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1740A43F93; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP (SSL) id MUA74016; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:17 -0700 Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id C3ED35D08; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT) To: John Baldwin In-Reply-To: Message from John Baldwin Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:21:16 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20030929202116.C3ED35D08@ptavv.es.net> cc: acpi-jp@jp.freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd ACPI behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:21:22 -0000 > Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:04:25 -0400 (EDT) > From: John Baldwin > > > On 29-Sep-2003 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I recently noticed that, when I boot with ACPI on my IBM T30, I get > > errors trying to probe the BIOS disabled sio1. This does not happen > > under apm and happens twice(?) when booting with ACPI and happens even > > though I have the line 'hint.sio.1.disabled="1"' in /boot/device.hints. > >>From my dmesg: > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > acpi_cmbat0: on acpi0 > > acpi_cmbat1: on acpi0 > > acpi_acad0: on acpi0 > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > > > Any idea why this is happening? It does not seem to be a serious > > issue, but it is very odd. > > > > acpidump output, full dmesg, config and whatever available on request. > > Do you kldload a module at some point during your boot? If so, that > would explain the double probe. Yes, it would, but I am not loading any kernel modules except the slightly automatic loads of ACPI, itself and a few others which should not cause a probe: ntfs, linux, linprocfs, and daemon_saver. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634