From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 30 16:50:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D43106566C for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 16:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9508FC20 for ; Sat, 30 May 2009 16:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from sarevok.dnr.servegame.org (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16D87E837; Sat, 30 May 2009 08:50:48 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:50:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.3 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.3; i386; ; ) References: <1F9F36FCD9644D4683DADAF7DD62B412@john> <200905301753.38697.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200905301850.47027.mel.flynn+fbsd.questions@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Johan Hendriks Subject: Re: Stable Mail Server And Web Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:50:50 -0000 On Saturday 30 May 2009 18:05:12 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Depends on your usage. I'd say for SMTP table lookups, MySQL can out > > perform PostgreSQL, unless one uses persistent connections (postfix > > proxy-map to be on topic). The reason for this is that the connection > > start up for MySQL has lower overhead then for PostgreSQL. > > for just quick searching of keys isn't just berkeley DB or maybe sqlite > the best. there will be no connecting at all. > > anyway sqlite is much more useful Only for single machine installs as I wouldn't recommend sqlite over NFS to share the database. The idea was to have one machine (or a replicated cluster) with a database and several mail servers getting their information from there. It's less about performance, more about a preference of how you want to manage your information. -- Mel