From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar  4 17:21:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A240A16A4CE; Fri,  4 Mar 2005 17:21:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EBC4C43D2F; Fri,  4 Mar 2005 17:21:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j24HK96M028186;
	Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:20:09 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 10:20:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20050304.102009.104046544.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: scottl@samsco.org
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <422891E5.3040402@samsco.org>
References: <20050305032619.K18638@delplex.bde.org>
	<42288FA6.7010102@freebsd.org>
	<422891E5.3040402@samsco.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org
cc: bde@zeta.org.au
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: deischen@FreeBSD.org
cc: davidxu@FreeBSD.org
cc: cperciva@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:21:38 -0000

> Using an address
> from the global heap is probably a better choice, but since the stacks
> are also allocated from the global heap now, there really isn't much of
> a difference.

When I have it, I just sleep on part of my softc that I don't sleep on
for other reasons.  Or more importantly, a part of my softc I never
wakeup.

Warner