From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 10 23:22:19 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0CD16A406 for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C0513C43E for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3ANMGl4068169; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:22:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: "George Kontostanos" Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:14:56 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <200703301545.48686.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704101914.57290.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:22:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/3064/Tue Apr 10 12:25:23 2007 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP BL460c X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 23:22:19 -0000 On Thursday 05 April 2007 09:55, George Kontostanos wrote: > Hi John, > > I tested the blades on the AMD platform with the Embedded NC370i Network > adapter and it works fine under 6-stable. I was wondering if there is any > patch that I could apply under 6-2 release for that network adapter. The > reason I'm asking is because we are talking for 3 servers 2ns and 1mail and > it would make me feel better following the release branch. You can probably just use sys/dev/mii/* and sys/dev/bce/* from 6.x-stable with a 6.2 tree and it should work ok. -- John Baldwin