From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 19:43:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2582C1065676 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lx@redundancy.redundancy.org) Received: from redundancy.redundancy.org (75-101-96-57.dsl.static.sonic.net [75.101.96.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C2B5F8FC25 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:43:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20000 invoked by uid 1001); 6 Jun 2010 23:59:57 -0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 16:59:57 -0700 From: "David E. Thiel" To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100606235957.GE3022@redundancy.redundancy.org> References: <19467.61790.690469.182207@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <4C0BF89F.90908@FreeBSD.org> <4C0BFBAB.9030808@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OpenPGP-Key-fingerprint: 482A 8C46 C844 7E7C 8CBC 2313 96EE BEE5 1F4B CA13 X-OpenPGP-Key-available: http://redundancy.redundancy.org/lx.gpg X-Face: %H~{$1~NOw1y#%mM6{|4:/ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:43:07 -0000 On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 08:15:33PM +0000, b. f. wrote: > What incompatibilities exist between that latest versions of the MIT > Kerberos and Heimdal implementations? How does des@ feel about it, > since libpam and openssh may have to be altered? My experience is a few years old, but last time I tried working with them together, I found the protocol used by kadmin was incompatible between the two implementations.