From owner-freebsd-hardware Tue Jul 27 12:26:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from persprog.com (persprog.com [209.208.0.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F4D1527A for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 12:25:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@mmrd.com) Received: by persprog.com (8.7.5/4.10) id OAA18009; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 14:17:06 -0500 Received: from dave.ppi.com(192.2.2.6) by cerberus.ppi.com via smap (V1.3) id sma018001; Tue Jul 27 15:16:38 1999 Message-ID: <199907271516420421.065BFD72@192.2.2.105> In-Reply-To: <199907271907.MAA18215@george.lbl.gov> References: <199907271907.MAA18215@george.lbl.gov> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.00.00.14 (1) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 15:16:42 -0400 From: "David W. Alderman" To: jin@george.lbl.gov, caa@midgard.dhs.org, maniattb@cs.rpi.edu Cc: Doug@gorean.org, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dual Processor Motherboards Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The Celeron is meant only to compete with AMD's K6 which is effectively uniprocessor thanks to the APIC. A multiprocessor Celeron competes with Intel's cash-cow, the P-III. On 7/27/1999 at 12:07 PM jin@george.lbl.gov dared write for all to see: >The story I heard was that Intel will combine the P-II, P-III, and Celeron >techonogy to make a new Celeron; maybe the person who told me this story >is wrong, but I could not think what is the good reason for Intel to make >Uniprocessor Celeron. > Dave Dave Alderman - "May my words today be sweet and tender, for tomorrow I may have to eat them." Business: dave@persprog.com is changing to dave@mmrd.com Personal: dwa@atlantic.net -or- dwa@netcommander.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message