From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jan 29 14:50:42 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1942637B428
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:50:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from caddis.yogotech.com (caddis.yogotech.com [206.127.123.130])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07480;
	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:30 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate@yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by caddis.yogotech.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g0TMoOw90353;
	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:25 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate)
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15447.10030.902189.861421@caddis.yogotech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:50:22 -0700
To: Dominic Marks <dominic_marks@btinternet.com>
Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>,
	hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD-1.X public cvs?
In-Reply-To: <20020129224704.A80530@host213-123-131-54.in-addr.btopenworld.com>
References: <20020129221330.A26284@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
	<15447.9241.804434.954890@caddis.yogotech.com>
	<20020129224704.A80530@host213-123-131-54.in-addr.btopenworld.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.96 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-hackers.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-hackers>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > > Now that ancient unix has been relicensed with an old-style BSD licence,
> > > is the FreeBSD-1.X cvs repository going to be made public?
> > 
> > Out of curiousity, why?
> 
> "Out of curiousity" :)
> 
> Perhaps for the same reasons I spent a half an hour getting BSD 2.11
> running on a PDP-11 emulator.
> 
> > And, where have you heard that it's been relicensed?
> > 
> 
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/PUPS/
> 
>  Quote:
>  "24th January 2002
>      Caldera have released several of the Ancient UNIX versions under a
> 	 BSD-style license. See their license agreement for more details."
> 
> Caldera's License Agreement:
> 
> http://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Caldera-license.pdf

Thanks.  However, this isn't as specific as I'd like it to be.  It
implies that Net1/Net2 are now 'legal', but it doesn't give explicit
release of said source code.


Nate

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message