From owner-cvs-all  Wed Nov 11 09:46:44 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA12679
          for cvs-all-outgoing; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:46:44 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA12672
          for <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 09:46:42 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jfieber@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu)
Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost)
	by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA23583;
	Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:46:17 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:46:17 -0500 (EST)
From: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/login Makefile login.c
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.981111080605.jdp@polstra.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811111240160.23538-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 11 Nov 1998, John Polstra wrote:

> It don't really think it makes any difference.  BSDI's interfaces
> are inferior to PAM's in several ways.  One example:  In the BSDI

Some time back I was hunting for some PAM modules for Solaris and
I discovered a variety of gratuitious differences between the
Solaris and Linux PAM APIs.  I didn't dig into who was at fault
for these differences but am now wondering which FreeBSD's PAM be
most compatible with (if either, or both).

-john


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message