From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Jul 15 21:55:30 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA03061
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 21:55:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fyeung5.netific.com (netific.vip.best.com [205.149.182.145])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA03052
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 21:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from fyeung@localhost) by fyeung5.netific.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA04148 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Jul 1996 22:00:54 GMT
From: francis yeung <fyeung@netific.com>
Message-Id: <199607152200.WAA04148@fyeung5.netific.com>
Subject: FreeBSD 2.1.5 Intel EtherExpress instability
To: questions@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 1996 22:00:53 +0000 ()
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Greetings.

	FreeBSD 2.1.5 Release Notes indicates that the use
	of the Intel EtherExpress (I assumed that it is a Pro/10) is
	not recommended due to driver instability. Does this apply
	to both 2.1.0 and 2.0.5 Releases. Or this only applies
	to FreeBSD 2.1.5 only. 

	Or Intel EtherExpress (Pro/10) should be used in all FreeBSD
	releases.

	Thank you for your help.

	Francis