From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 20 18:51:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46D816A41C;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from harmony.village.org (vc4-2-0-66.dsl.netrack.net [199.45.160.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7767B43D1F;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5KIo8XP026494;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:50:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:51:28 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20050620.125128.126914795.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: rwatson@freebsd.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050619155228.Y6413@fledge.watson.org>
References: <20050619155228.Y6413@fledge.watson.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a
 Soekris 4801
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:51:39 -0000

In message: <20050619155228.Y6413@fledge.watson.org>
            Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes:
: XXX The following FAILURE message from ATA seems a bit extreme, perhaps 
: the word warning would be more appropriate:
: 
:    ad1: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE status=51<READY,DSC,ERROR> error=4<AB
:    ad1: FAILURE - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE status=51<READY,DSC,ERROR> error=4<AB

These are not unique to NanoBSD and have happend on CF parts since
sometime in the 4.x stable branch...

Warner