From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 25 12:32:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745111065694 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-net@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B8B8FC1C for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLazw-0006Yh-9v for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:24 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:24 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 13:32:18 +0100 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <4CEBBB8F.70400@sentex.net> <20101123151153.GB27694@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20101125150444.D1713@besplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <20101125150444.D1713@besplex.bde.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: em driver, 82574L chip, and possibly ASPM X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 12:32:26 -0000 On 11/25/10 05:54, Bruce Evans wrote: > Yes, this is normal. It is how ping -f doesn't work -- it doesn't do > anything > resembling flooding, except possibly accidentally when 1 Mbps ethernet was > fast. The ramping up is also accidental. > ... Thank you, that was a very informative explanation! So in case I really do want to flood ping or in some other way test PPS throughput, are there any convenient tools for that?