From owner-svn-doc-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 23:59:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-doc-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E4CC80; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-7.MIT.EDU [18.7.68.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07031F6; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:59:02 +0000 (UTC) X-AuditID: 12074424-b7f2a6d000007b15-95-512411c095ea Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 87.34.31509.0C114215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:58:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id r1JNwu10005196; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:58:56 -0500 Received: from multics.mit.edu (SYSTEM-LOW-SIPB.MIT.EDU [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id r1JNwrHi016151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:58:55 -0500 Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id r1JNwr27014263; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:58:53 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:58:53 -0500 (EST) From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: svn commit: r41010 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors In-Reply-To: <20130219221651.GB15736@saturn> Message-ID: References: <201302181954.r1IJsLmd095109@svn.freebsd.org> <20130219221651.GB15736@saturn> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrXtAUCXQYPE/CYsfHw8xWez6O4fZ YvVib4sbi/YzWezu72V2YPWY8Wk+SwBjFJdNSmpOZllqkb5dAlfG4pPtjAVzuSqWfDzN3sC4 iqOLkZNDQsBE4uvCf0wQtpjEhXvr2boYuTiEBPYxSny93cIE4WxklNja3cUO4Rxiknjb9YUV wmlglHjzegeQw8HBIqAt8XtBBsgoNgEViZlvNrKB2CICOhLXnr5lASlhFqiRaF4ZARIWFvCX mD37MguIzQlUcvrhdEYQm1fAQWJ74woWiPF9jBLn/hxlB0mIAhWt3j+FBaJIUOLkzCdgNrOA pcS/tb9YJzAKzkKSmoUktYCRaRWjbEpulW5uYmZOcWqybnFyYl5eapGuuV5uZoleakrpJkZQ 8LK7qOxgbD6kdIhRgINRiYdXY75yoBBrYllxZe4hRkkOJiVRXhselUAhvqT8lMqMxOKM+KLS nNTiQ4wSHMxKIrzurEA53pTEyqrUonyYlDQHi5I47/WUm/5CAumJJanZqakFqUUwWRkODiUJ 3koBoEbBotT01Iq0zJwShDQTByfIcB6g4QkgNbzFBYm5xZnpEPlTjIpS4rx5IAkBkERGaR5c Lyy5vGIUB3pFmHcCH1AVDzAxwXW/AhrMBDR47XJlkMEliQgpqQbGw/+P5km7BCmumBUukf/j STBDgLO5tEdjaspHxjkzvbVKxb9pz3JYuWr6ts1p0lrVBx0bJcozvp27yxzw4NbTA8Wm7n0v dtw5OG9XkeDxL3OWLu6VyFtWsDzg1OeT0275C5by80UrPZfJLXk+bfMNI+l6JYlUTrud7vMr Ts/WS61Lbazv7z2oxFKckWioxVxUnAgAf3sC6QkDAAA= Cc: svn-doc-head@freebsd.org, svn-doc-all@freebsd.org, doc-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-doc-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire doc trees \(except for " user" , " projects" , and " translations" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:59:03 -0000 On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2013-02-18 16:01, Benjamin Kaduk wrote: >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013, Eitan Adler wrote: >>> Author: eadler >>> Date: Mon Feb 18 19:54:21 2013 >>> New Revision: 41010 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/41010 >>> >>> Log: >>> While cvsup is deprecated, as long as it is documented and working, >>> don't document bogus, ancient, or useless parts. >>> >>> Approved by: bcr (mentor) >>> >>> Modified: >>> head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors/chapter.xml >>> >>> Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors/chapter.xml >>> - With this very useful feature, those users who are on >>> + With this very feature, those users who are on >> >> Do we care more that it is this particular feature or that it is a >> useful feature? ("With this very ..." does not seem particularly >> consistent with our style.) > > 'With this very feature' can be understood also as 'with this specific > feature' or 'with precisely this feature', so it's syntactically > correct. It _is_ a bit confusing though as a diff/change, so I'd > probably prefer the simpler 'With this feature' too. That's what I was trying to say, sorry if it was unclear. The committed fix seems acceptable. -Ben