From owner-freebsd-mobile Sat Apr 10 22: 6:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7F314F98 for ; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 22:06:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA31022; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:03:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA02349; Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:03:32 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199904110503.XAA02349@harmony.village.org> To: Michael Robinson Subject: Re: Flash fs spec Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Apr 1999 12:59:56 +0800." <199904110459.MAA05258@netrinsics.com> References: <199904110459.MAA05258@netrinsics.com> Date: Sat, 10 Apr 1999 23:03:32 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199904110459.MAA05258@netrinsics.com> Michael Robinson writes: : FWIW, I always mount the SmartMedia cards from my Olympus as '-t msdos', : and have no problems with interoperability. They look just like big MS-DOS : floppy disks as far as FreeBSD is concerned. I have heard that is the case also. I'd like to have a file system that is more friendly to the underlying FLASH than FAT would be. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message