From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 11 08:38:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 765D1F0A for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1266CE0D for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so3269633wey.0 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8bIJjWrztJKme+F9vDZk4c+G236r8pTXHYZ8gdfhxOY=; b=seVRf6CFByspcIXLFp9D6HmclmKPuylDOfkteeP/+cBwYRgH/pHKQc8vola2a/94qv evAzEVF2jjejs5UWvIv+4gC/uJRtTLspUAYBhcIm/ZKta6GFSAGxszq2G2FxZmvhebNs SZZ/+NrK8nmsEOvJBaSnWZZQnwNvQfg7CtRjRWjUcSkLtLIcygv7XAwpQY6Nh+5ncAQK EdcnYdf1EvtLyyNYiwthgSDe4j+aK7F9tRYRqLsYMgJbO56j+sDsPv0uVK+gCUUGJhzS 0/ZsGwos7g75avXZ3cPuoNiHHjnByJ9sUnAw/dFpaWycJiIPVbeAjq3Q/hwfgW2oYxDh +c4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.121.6 with SMTP id lg6mr17216770wjb.22.1362991137280; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.60.147 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1362962042-5325577.76629789.fr2B0Xoe2027453@rs149.luxsci.com> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130125092723.GC79995@e-Gitt.NET> <1359320641-6493504.60501067.fr0RL3aYw027137@rs149.luxsci.com> <1359380582-6256705.77592125.fr0SDgrYH000991@rs149.luxsci.com> <1362962042-5325577.76629789.fr2B0Xoe2027453@rs149.luxsci.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:38:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? From: David Demelier To: "Isaac (.ike) Levy" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, John Mehr X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:38:58 -0000 Yes that would be great to have svnup into base as we had with cvsup then I will be able to fetch ports/base without doing any other steps before :) 2013/3/11 Isaac (.ike) Levy > On Feb 23, 2013, at 7:36 PM, John Mehr wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I've believe I've made just about all of the progress optimizing svnup > > as I can and I've just submitted it as a new port. With my ~ 350kb/s > > DSL connection, it now takes just under 30 minutes to download a fresh > > base/releng/8.3 tree using svnup (Subversion's svn takes approximately > > 12 minutes). Incremental updates, such as tracking one of the stable > > branches takes only 2-3 minutes. > > For anyone that wants to preview the port before it gets added to the > > ports tree (assuming I got the send-pr correct), the tarball is located > > at: > > http://jcm.dsl.visi.com/freebsd/svnup/svnup-0.5.tar.xz > > Please let me know if you find any issues. > > If anyone has any info about sunup(1) making it's way into base, please > tell me so I can kill this page: > > https://wiki.freebsd.org/UsersFetchingSource > > (After trying to catch up on the relevant lists, I just updated that > 'status page' on the FreeBSD wiki.) > > -- > John, this is spectacular- thank you! > > Rocket- > .ike > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Demelier David