From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 05:37:27 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CEB16A400 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CB2F13C4B8 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2007 05:37:25 -0000 Received: from nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [129.13.72.169] by mail.gmx.net (mp034) with SMTP; 17 Jun 2007 07:37:25 +0200 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+k10pROGWkq8c0ypgBfS0ag+4t9histmRCG0kgRi iF5XM3T/1REx9e Message-ID: <4674C894.8090500@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 07:37:24 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070616) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20070614070602.GD39533@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200706140714.l5E7EK0U023767@smtpclu-1.eunet.yu> <20070614075418.GA8093@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <200706142322.l5ENMbZt009741@smtpclu-6.eunet.yu> <20070615121125.GH1173@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4673B353.5040006@sasktel.net> <20070616114154.GA56829@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <4674AD7C.3090603@sasktel.net> In-Reply-To: <4674AD7C.3090603@sasktel.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Stephen Hurd Subject: Re: Keeping track of automatically installed dependency-only ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 05:37:27 -0000 Stephen Hurd wrote: > Jeremie Le Hen wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 02:54:27AM -0700, Stephen Hurd wrote: >> >>> All of this rather assumes that *everything* is installed from >>> ports. 1) install portXXX which requires SDL, so SDL gets sucked in >>> 2) build thingYYY (which uses configure and only uses SDL if it's >>> already installed - common) manually and install it >>> >> >> If thingYYY detects SDL and uses it at configure stage, it should be >> recorded in the dependency list. I suppose this is up to the >> maintainer to deal with this as whether the aforementioned feature >> exists or not, nothing would prevent the user from deinstalling SDL >> and break thingYYY otherwise. >> > > Hrm? In step 2, "manually" meant "Not using ports" > That is to say that I downloaded it from Sourceforge myself, extracted > it myself, built and installed it myself. > > I do this fairly often. When I want to use Software that is not in ports, I get it into the ports tree.