From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 22 11:05:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA1716A4CE for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:05:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (hak.cnd.mcgill.ca [132.216.11.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F0B43D1D for ; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:05:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: from hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1MJ7LCR042732; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:07:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mat@hak.cnd.mcgill.ca) Received: (from mat@localhost) by hak.cnd.mcgill.ca (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id i1MJ7KNe042731; Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:07:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 14:07:20 -0500 From: Mathew Kanner To: Autrijus Tang Message-ID: <20040222190720.GF20226@cnd.mcgill.ca> References: <1077357399.2405.4.camel@localhost> <1077395693.3133.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1077395693.3133.7.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: I speak for myself, operating in Montreal, CANADA X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.62 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.62 (2004-01-11) on hak.cnd.mcgill.ca cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org cc: chris@chrisburkert.de Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix snd_ich support for Asus M2400N X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:05:17 -0000 On Feb 21, Autrijus Tang wrote: > (This is a folllow-up to misc/61388) Hello Autrijus, That PR hasn't been classified as sound yet. First let me say thanks for the patch. > Hi. Here is a patch against -CURRENT that fixes ich4 support for > pcm0: . > It works by backporting > the legacy support for NAMBAR/NABMBAR from 5.1-RELEASE, instead > of using the newer and broken MMBAR/MBBAR. I've quite confused by the statement above. I think you mean that FreeBSD-5.1+ has a problem where...and we need to enable legacy mode on the ich4(only) by poking a register? Are you confident that if I commit this patch, it won't disrupt other ich users? (It would be helpful if others with ich hardware would let us know :) ) Thanks, --Mat -- Applicants must also have extensive knowledge of UNIX, although they should have sufficiently good programming taste to not consider this an achievement. - MIT AI Lab job ad in the /Boston Globe/