From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 6 17: 8:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B428137B401 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08D3643EB2 for ; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:08:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 12624 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Jan 2003 01:08:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2003 17:08:47 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson To: ryan beasley Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: current/stable remote gdb interoperability In-Reply-To: <20030105115632.GA311@goddamnbastard.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, ryan beasley wrote: > For what it's worth, I've taken Nate's suggestion and backed down to > 9600bps, and this problem hasn't occurred yet, so I'm assuming this is > the "fix". (The 4.7 machine has an ASUS P2B-D board, and the -CURRENT > box is a recent Dell Dimension, so I don't *think* I'm using garbage > serial hardware.) Though slow, I guess I can't complain if it works. > :). Bruce was right in that sio is polled when in the debugger so interrupt speed shouldn't be a problem. However, this behavior IS a problem with -current but not -stable and it is not your hw's problem. I have not been able to track down what is causing this problem. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message