From owner-freebsd-java Fri Mar 9 16:38: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from gnuppy.monkey.org (cx739861-a.dt1.sdca.home.com [24.5.164.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C35737B71A for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:38:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@gnuppy.monkey.org) Received: from billh by gnuppy.monkey.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14bWpY-0000WO-00; Fri, 09 Mar 2001 16:01:56 -0800 Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 16:01:55 -0800 To: Greg Lewis Cc: Bill Huey , freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OpenPackages + Java ? Message-ID: <20010309160155.A1957@gnuppy> References: <20010310085600.A64632@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010310085600.A64632@misty.eyesbeyond.com>; from glewis@eyesbeyond.com on Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 08:56:00AM +1030 From: Bill Huey Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Mar 10, 2001 at 08:56:00AM +1030, Greg Lewis wrote: > Just one question. Why #openpackages rather than #bsdjava :) > Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com I just hijacked that too. ;-) Originally I conceived the possiblity that the JVM should be the first openpackage module to be released to the public, but it's looking like that'll complicate things more than necessary given what the group wants, unclarity of the goals, no code, etc... bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message