From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 12 22:39:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1411065673; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461438FC19; Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id q6CMU54p079891 ; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:30:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 165 Received: from [192.168.1.100] (sge91-2-82-227-32-26.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.32.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C86CD2084B; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:30:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Michel Talon Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3C0B37DE-5D26-405F-97D4-081BC9E6F975"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:30:03 +0200 Message-Id: To: Doug Barton Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4FFF4FED.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4FFF4FED.001/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP & CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 22:39:09 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_3C0B37DE-5D26-405F-97D4-081BC9E6F975 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Doug Barton wrote: > What I'm looking for is compelling motivation to make this = overwhelming > change to the ports infrastructure. Because the present state of the ports system is not a compelling enough = reason? My arms are falling =85 -- Michel Talon talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr --Apple-Mail=_3C0B37DE-5D26-405F-97D4-081BC9E6F975--