From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 19 10:24:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B751C1065674 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@kkip.pl) Received: from mainframe.kkip.pl (kkip.pl [87.105.164.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E1108FC19 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:24:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@kkip.pl) Received: from admin.admin.lan.kkip.pl ([10.66.3.254]) by mainframe.kkip.pl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1L2kEv-00085J-Ga for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:24:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4923E977.8030107@kkip.pl> Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:24:55 +0100 From: Bartosz Stec User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Stable References: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org> <20081109184349.GG51239@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4920D879.3070806@jrv.org> <20081117050441.GA16855@ourbrains.org> <20081118175210.GA3753@hyperion.scode.org> <20081119001742.GA21835@ourbrains.org> <49235D86.4050106@modulus.org> <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no> <4923D460.5020900@kkip.pl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Authenticated-User: admin@kkip.pl X-Authenticator: plain X-Sender-Verify: SUCCEEDED (sender exists & accepts mail) X-Spam-Score: -8.3 X-Spam-Score-Int: -82 X-Exim-Version: 4.69 (build at 01-Nov-2008 10:39:57) X-Date: 2008-11-19 11:24:55 X-Connected-IP: 10.66.3.254:1849 X-Message-Linecount: 56 X-Body-Linecount: 43 X-Message-Size: 2255 X-Body-Size: 1371 X-Received-Count: 1 X-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Count: 1 X-Local-Recipient-Defer-Count: 0 X-Local-Recipient-Fail-Count: 0 Subject: Re: Will XFS be adopted X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:24:56 -0000 Claus Guttesen pisze: >>>> [...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into >>>> the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server. >>>> >>> ZFS has been in 7 for over a year. >>> >>> DES >>> >> Yes, it's in STABLE, however zfs module says: >> >> This module (opensolaris) contains code covered by the >> Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) >> see http://opensolaris.org/os/licensing/opensolaris_license/ >> *WARNING: ZFS is considered to be an experimental feature in FreeBSD.* >> >> So ZFS in 7.X should not be considered as STABLE for now. >> > > Install a server with zfs and test it. Then let it handle tasks that > are not critical. And if it works for you proceed and deploy it. It's > somewhat difficult to say that it works for your particular workload. > Some have rather positive experience and others are very reluctant. > > I use it as an internal samba-server and the issues I have are related > to the external sas-cabinet rather than zfs itself. > > Well it's not simple indeed. I use ZFS on my home (not critical) box (RAIDZ1). After 4 weeks uptime with varied workload I assumed it's stable. Unfortunately ZFS crashed next week ;) -- Bartosz Stec AUXILIA Spółka z o.o. ul. Wałbrzyska 43/2 52-314 Wrocław tel. (71) 79 99 760 w. 69 GSM: 662171775 E-Mail: admin@kkip.pl