From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 20 19:08:50 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB10116A41C;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576F243D4C;
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org)
Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11])
	by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id j5KJ8lZv026841; 
	Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 15:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050620.125452.102654445.imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506201507010.11816-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net)
Cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk, rwatson@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a
 Soekris 4801 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:08:50 -0000

On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, M. Warner Losh wrote:

> In message: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0506191610170.7472-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
>             Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes:
> : How about NO_FOO[_INSTALL], where NO_FOO = no build and no install,
> : and NO_FOO_INSTALL just prevents the install.  In theory, you could
> : build the complete system, then use NO_FOO_INSTALL instead of rm(1).
>
> What's wrong with making sure that NO_FOO will work in the install
> case to not install foo when it is set, even if it was unset in the
> build process?

If it works or can be made to work, then nothing.

-- 
DE