From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 21:40:02 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A092D3AF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9B5E4B for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s26Le27F038685 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) id s26Le2HK038684; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:40:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 21:40:02 GMT Message-Id: <201403062140.s26Le2HK038684@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Chris Nehren Subject: Re: ports/186272: Incorrect application of CPPFLAGS for games/angband causes build failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Nehren List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 21:40:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/186272; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Chris Nehren To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/186272: Incorrect application of CPPFLAGS for games/angband causes build failure Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 16:30:38 -0500 --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Now that I'm on FreeBSD 10, this failure doesn't seem to be happening any more. I don't readily have a system on 9.x still to test this, but can set up a VM easily enough, if that would help get this fixed more quickly. --=20 Chris Nehren --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQJMBAABAgA2BQJTGOj9LxSAAAAAABUAEXBrYS1hZGRyZXNzQGdudXBnLm9yZ2Nu ZWhyZW5AcG9ib3guY29tAAoJEB6OfWhX/6FTkbQP/jmYmaqwE98x4S+Pfko3GA7z tq/MSn8KIBs0Rtg1XMo1CmfNuqXepRcEK/wbSVGnV8mXhvbjgXPSYJXO7wdzKX3u Z5fLvdY8xlhJ+FukoLhf4kPhNpMEmf5+3hFPB9VtmGpo9vy4DqIkDJTdrqZyTEQy Rml0uOHorhCiE//trWmyrWmekPvAHcOqkYi6+LYT0HOK6bufE3Xp+1vvBvzdkSBp 4Mztn9h2A3Z30bbwx1OtoiK1QuuTCcvlaEpOzEGBavwoHGhtaZx8f0IAMc7OrBFL YL3+XKK/Koqk7c5uSsqPQRXar3TlHgC+0K/U42I7zRxsqGTFr9FVhXisqHjHweLF 3L/Ch0mzflSV0gOn+CEWzS3y6Unf2binHzYHy+AVdj4ssiGqzo4KO7QJ3QrWr1Hd UmcEDT/1Sb/TroFWY6nSikoMuo5qUwxu5a8U4Wx7BgXg4lwwqZ9AlaH3e7MJcJPK n+DitNU9l9f0OewH4giziDlFYWNhTwL9yt5HrrCuYyprzUJpdDCiRg8Y4OSgBFuW IroOxgEEXqM+nsjgf881LHRrrg/DTOi1K9kAobF/BenNwOZbrxTmGQI23sfxtT3j ZkhcTIhx1u1Z1142KzncFWeoVi6LqyfZbd7heKzCgvhYc5ffCsBtNjiD1BVseSr8 nyEFg42xUK3yxrN1UsnC =ejc4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG--