From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Apr 25 2:30:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4237837BCA6 for ; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:30:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca42-122.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.122]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA12610; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 05:30:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id CAA03502; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 02:30:34 -0700 (PDT) To: Will Andrews Cc: Chuck Robey , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: syslog-ng's category (see PR 18187) References: <20000425001747.B445@argon.blackdawn.com> <20000425003243.C445@argon.blackdawn.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 25 Apr 2000 02:30:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:32:43 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Will Andrews * On Tue, Apr 25, 2000 at 12:26:54AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: * > Noting that both are reasonable answers, I would say that since it's only * > a user of security, and doesn't either provide security to other services * > or audits (only use security in providing it's own service) I would stick * > it into sysutils. * * I would, too. But I'm going to gather opinions before I make a decision. So * far the favor seems to be sysutils. I agree with Chuck, for whatever it's worth. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message